Bug 1782828

Summary: [RHEL-8.2][RDMA] remove dangling symlink
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Honggang LI <honli>
Component: rdma-coreAssignee: Honggang LI <honli>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: zguo <zguo>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.2CC: hwkernel-mgr, rdma-dev-team, tmichael, zguo
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 8.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rdma-core-26.0-6.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-28 16:57:33 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Honggang LI 2019-12-12 12:55:35 UTC
Description of problem:

There are some dangling symbolic links should be removed.

https://rpmdiff.engineering.redhat.com/run/425533/27/

NEEDS INSPECTION 	rdma-core-devel 	

File usr/lib64/libefa.so became a dangling symlink (to libefa.so.1) on aarch64 x86_64 ppc64le s390x

	
NEEDS INSPECTION 	rdma-core-devel 	

File usr/lib/libefa.so became a dangling symlink (to libefa.so.1) on i686


NEEDS INSPECTION 	libibverbs 	

File usr/lib64/libibverbs/libefa-rdmav25.so became a dangling symlink (to ../libefa.so.1.1.26.0) on aarch64 x86_64 ppc64le s390x

NEEDS INSPECTION 	libibverbs 	

File usr/lib/libibverbs/libefa-rdmav25.so became a dangling symlink (to ../libefa.so.1.1.26.0) on i686


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 16:57:33 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:1865