Bug 178367
| Summary: | kernel memory leak while reading from /proc/cluster/[nodes|services] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite | Reporter: | Lon Hohberger <lhh> | ||||
| Component: | cman | Assignee: | Robert Peterson <rpeterso> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Cluster QE <mspqa-list> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 4 | CC: | cluster-maint | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2006-0559 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-08-10 21:32:30 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Created attachment 123464 [details] Proposed patch for /proc/cluster/services memory leak This patch contains three things: 1. Patrick Caulfield's code fix for bz 177163 as of 19 January 2006. 2. Bob Peterson's patch for adding /proc/cluster/smsg_history and /proc/cluster/msg_history for cman-kernel debugging purposes. 3. Bob Peterson's proposed patch to fix the memory leak when using /proc/cluster/services and /proc/cluster/nodes Regarding #2: The fix is mainly for debugging purposes. The patch as it stands allocates a bunch of memory for the module that shouldn't be necessary for normal customer situations. I'm planning to revise it to make it more useful, i.e. able to turn it on/off with a customer command and allocate/deallocate the memory as needed by doing insmod of a companion module or possibly by echoing something to another file in /proc/cluster/, etc. This way, if a customer has a problem, we can request that they turn the patch on and take information from the failure, while still not impacting other customers. Additional notes: I researched the proper way to use seq_files for /proc to make sure this fix would work properly. For example, see: http://www.kernelnewbies.org/documents/seq_file_howto.txt Excerpt from that document: "struct seq_file contains a "void *private" that can be used by the struct seq_operations functions to hold any private data that needs to be available to all of these related methods. For example, the .start method might allocate some memory and save its address in seq_file.private so that the .next and .show methods can use it, then the .stop method would free that memory." Also, I unit-tested this fix with printk messages to verify it was working as planned and all kmallocs were paired with their proper kfrees. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0559.html |
Description of problem: If you read from /proc/cluster/services or /proc/cluster/nodes, CMAN appears to leak memory if you watch /proc/slabinfo, specifically in the size-32 section. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 15-Jan-2006 CVS / RHEL4 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Form a one-node cluster. Don't start fenced or rgmanager. Do not load the DLM module or mount GFS file systems. 2. In one terminal window, run: while : ; do cat /proc/cluster/services ; done &> /dev/null 3. In another terminal window, run: watch --interval=1 "cat /proc/slabinfo | grep size-32\ " Actual results: slab-32 grows unbounded, suggesting a memory leak when we read from /proc/cluster/services. Expected results: ? Additional info: I originally thought this was a memory leak in the DLM, which turned out to be incorrect.