Bug 178467

Summary: ssh is hidden from list of firewall services
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Need Real Name <lsof>
Component: system-config-securitylevelAssignee: Chris Lumens <clumens>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-01-23 16:30:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 150222    

Description Need Real Name 2006-01-20 20:49:11 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051215 Epiphany/1.9.4

Description of problem:
Anyone who has installed Real Player on Windows will remember their infamous preferences screens, which showed fairly sensible defaults for the parts of the preferences on screen, but which chose the opposite for preferences you had to scroll to see.

The firewall config screen shows a list of disabled services. If you scroll down, you will see that the single hidden service (SSH) is enabled.
Sensible? Perhaps, but it shouldn't be hidden, especially not for the sake of a single line.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
x

Additional info:

Comment 1 Chris Lumens 2006-01-20 23:56:18 UTC
This is simply because we have to pick a size for that combo box.  If I make it
bigger, it might look odd on some resolutions.  If I make it smaller, more stuff
will be hidden.  The fact that just one thing is hidden and that it's ssh is
coincidental.  Hopefully, people will scroll through the list rather than
blindly take the defaults.

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2006-01-21 00:00:16 UTC
Even with it being coincidence, though, it's less than ideal.  Maybe sort by the
port #? :-)

Comment 3 Need Real Name 2006-01-21 10:09:34 UTC
Or sort by enabled services first?

Comment 4 Chris Lumens 2006-01-23 16:30:38 UTC
How about sorting by service name, since that's the text that's being displayed?