Bug 1787458
Summary: | protobuf-lite-devel missing from RHEL/CentOS 8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden> |
Component: | protobuf | Assignee: | Adrian Reber <areber> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Chao Ye <cye> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Jaroslav Klech <jklech> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.4 | CC: | areber, cye, jklech, jwboyer, skozina, zsun |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-11-04 03:24:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1816460, 1819237, 1825061 |
Description
Filipe Brandenburger
2020-01-02 22:48:04 UTC
Any comments on this one? Can I help in any way? It seems to me this should be simple, the package is likely already being built, so it's just the matter of including it in the appropriate repositories for CentOS 8 (PowerTools) and RHEL 8 (CBR, I believe.) In specific, the problem I'm trying to solve is provide a build for EternalTerminal in EPEL. EternalTerminal uses protobuf-lite, but unfortunately I can't build it without an appropriate protobuf-lite-devel and there's really no good way for me to get that package... Adding that package to EPEL itself is not really possible either, since protobuf-lite and the other packages *are* available from RHEL/CentOS. Thanks in advance! Filipe Filipe, we are working on getting protobuf-lite-devel into CRB. Hi Adrian! Any updates to this one? Did it make it into CRB? Thanks! Filipe (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #5) > Hi Adrian! > > Any updates to this one? Did it make it into CRB? > > Thanks! > Filipe Hi Filipe, This is work in progress for a future RHEL minor release. More information will be added when it is available. Confirm protobuf-lite-devel is now included in CRB repo: ============================================================= [root@dell-per720-01 ~]# yum info protobuf-lite-devel --enablerepo=beaker-CRB Updating Subscription Management repositories. Unable to read consumer identity This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use subscription-manager to register. beaker-CRB 34 MB/s | 1.9 MB 00:00 Available Packages Name : protobuf-lite-devel Version : 3.5.0 Release : 13.el8 Architecture : i686 Size : 16 k Source : protobuf-3.5.0-13.el8.src.rpm Repository : beaker-CRB Summary : Protocol Buffers LITE_RUNTIME development libraries URL : https://github.com/google/protobuf License : BSD Description : This package contains development libraries built with : optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME. : : The "optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME" option causes the compiler to generate code : which only depends libprotobuf-lite, which is much smaller than libprotobuf but : lacks descriptors, reflection, and some other features. Name : protobuf-lite-devel Version : 3.5.0 Release : 13.el8 Architecture : x86_64 Size : 16 k Source : protobuf-3.5.0-13.el8.src.rpm Repository : beaker-CRB Summary : Protocol Buffers LITE_RUNTIME development libraries URL : https://github.com/google/protobuf License : BSD Description : This package contains development libraries built with : optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME. : : The "optimize_for = LITE_RUNTIME" option causes the compiler to generate code : which only depends libprotobuf-lite, which is much smaller than libprotobuf but : lacks descriptors, reflection, and some other features. Move to VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (protobuf bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4733 |