Bug 1788656
Summary: | [Disperse volume]: Regression in IO performance seen in sequential read for large file | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Ashish Pandey <aspandey> |
Component: | read-ahead | Assignee: | Ashish Pandey <aspandey> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Mugdha Soni <musoni> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | rhgs-3.5 | CC: | akrishna, amukherj, aspandey, jahernan, musoni, nchilaka, pprakash, puebele, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, rkothiya, rtalur, sheggodu, storage-qa-internal, vdas |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | pprakash:
needinfo-
|
Target Release: | RHGS 3.5.z Batch Update 1 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-6.0-26 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Performance translators, 'io-cache' and 'read-ahead' were not adding any performance improvement. The 'read-ahead' is redundant due to kernel 'read-ahead' and 'io-cache' was degrading the performance for workloads that don’t involve re-read.
As the VFS layer already has both these functionalities, the two translators have been turned off by default for native fuse mounts. Due to this, there is improved performance for the sequential read.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1735666 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2020-01-30 06:42:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1735666 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1696815 |
Comment 22
Mugdha Soni
2020-01-27 10:37:36 UTC
have updated the doc text kindly verify the doc text- field. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0288 Based on the comment#17 and comment#19 i clear the need info on me . |