Bug 1796
Summary: | Why Does a upgrade blow away my non-redhat rpms ??? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | aap |
Component: | installer | Assignee: | Matt Wilson <msw> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.0 | CC: | jbj, msw |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 1999-04-15 16:15:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
aap
1999-03-25 19:21:25 UTC
On an upgrade, rpm only replaces packages that it thinks are "newer". Your old rpms appeared older and consequently were replaced. Is this the problem? ------- Email Received From aapuch.ncsu.edu 03/25/99 15:43 ------- bonnie isn't included in the red hat linux distribution, so I am somewhat surprised that the installer removed it. Unless there is a bug in the RPM code. Matt, Jeff, what do you make of this? Is there any way that this could have happened? Is the binary still physically there, and just the entry has been removed from the rpm database, or did the package actually get entirely removed from your disk? *pokes drew* What's the matter exactly? Use whole sentences. |