Bug 1800042

Summary: rubygem-vegas: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: rubygem-vegasAssignee: Jun Aruga <jaruga>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 32CC: jaruga, ktdreyer, vondruch
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rubygem-vegas-0.1.11-12.fc33 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-02-21 15:02:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1750908    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 19:53:28 UTC
rubygem-vegas failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41321595


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix rubygem-vegas at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
rubygem-vegas will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33,
rubygem-vegas will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 19:53:30 UTC
Created attachment 1660793 [details]
build.log

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 19:53:32 UTC
Created attachment 1660794 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 19:53:33 UTC
Created attachment 1660795 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 16:48:43 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 5 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:31:33 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 6 Jun Aruga 2020-02-18 17:06:30 UTC
The unit test is failed in the build process.

But the upstream is not updated the latest 8 years.
My pull-request to add CI 2 years ago is still not merged.
https://github.com/quirkey/vegas

I will let this package orphaned.

Comment 7 Vít Ondruch 2020-02-19 09:23:02 UTC
(In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #6)
> I will let this package orphaned.

Then you should let it go together with rubygem-resque. But nothing depends on rubygem-resque, so it should be just fine to let go both.

Comment 8 Jun Aruga 2020-02-20 15:11:41 UTC
Thanks for checking.
resque is used in 3Scale application.
If we drop rubygem-resque, it might be a problem in the future.

Let me fix this.

Comment 9 Jun Aruga 2020-02-21 12:20:45 UTC
I sent PR.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-vegas/pull-request/1

As vegas is not directly related to Rails and the dependencies, your review could be optional.