Bug 1800780
Summary: | improve handling of GCP routes for load balancing purposes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Micah Abbott <miabbott> |
Component: | Machine Config Operator | Assignee: | Antonio Murdaca <amurdaca> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Michael Nguyen <mnguyen> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.4 | CC: | adahiya, behoward, cglombek, smilner, vrutkovs, walters |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.5.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-04-29 14:14:59 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Micah Abbott
2020-02-07 21:00:13 UTC
Related: PR to move gcp-routes.service into MCO's privileged gcp-routes-controller container: https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/1489 *** Bug 1782536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** As a side note GCP routes are really not system configuration nor upgrade (MCO) nor operating system. I understand that this functionality currently resides within MCO but the reality is it should live where cloud configuration occurs OR possibly where special cloud workarounds exist (EG: agent -- afterburn). |