Bug 1800963
Summary: | Review Request: SDL2_sound - SDL2_sound is SDL_sound but with a SDL2 backend. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | François Cami <fdc> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fcami, fdc, fedora, package-review, ppisar |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-09-23 21:38:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
François Cami
2020-02-09 14:29:05 UTC
Please consider this WIP - it's not ready for a full review yet. >%build >%cmake [...] >%make_build > >%install >%make_install I think it's preferred to use %{cmake_build} and %{cmake_install}. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CMake/#_available_macros >%package -n %{name}-devel >Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} This should be an archful dependency - "%{name}%{?_isa} - %{version}-%{release}". >Conflicts: SDL_sound <= 1.0.3 Every other SDL add-on (_ttf, _mixer, etc.) can be installed in both SDL and SDL2 versions. Would it be possible to patch this so it can be installed alongside "old" SDL_sound? Thanks Artur. I don't remember why I added the conflict. I am not interested in working on this anymore, please feel free to pull the SPEC/SRPM and open another review request. |