Bug 1800994
Summary: | Review Request: raysession - Ray Session is a GNU/Linux session manager for audio programs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Erich Eickmeyer <erich> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, quantum.analyst | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2020-02-10 17:32:45 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Erich Eickmeyer
2020-02-09 21:56:59 UTC
Created attachment 1661993 [details]
RaySession.spec
You need to link to the raw copy of the spec and srpm so that fedora-review works. Lower-case is preferred, though not required. However, you should be consistent about it; this review should be for RaySession, not raysession, and the %global pname seems unused. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_case_sensitivity All the %globals at the top of the spec are unnecessary. You are building a tagged release, not a snapshot. BuildArch, not BuildArchitectures. I don't know why you have filtering for libjack, there is neither libjack.so listed in files, nor any compiled files that would cause there to be Requires on it. INSTALL.md is not a necessary %doc. COPYING should be marked as %license instead. Forgot a couple things: Release is missing %{?dist} Add a comment describing patch status https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/PatchUpstreamStatus/ Thank you so much Elliott! My first time submitting a package to Fedora. Most of my prior packaging experience is in the Debian/Ubuntu system, so this is a bit of a learning curve, albiet not too steep of one. Shall I close this and submit a new review request bug? I got the raw spec file at https://pagure.io/RaySession/raw/master/f/RaySession.spec and made the changes you reqested. No need to open a new bug, just post the new links to the spec and srpm in the future. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1801352 *** |