Bug 1803069

Summary:	echoping: buffer overflow vulnerabilities leads to arbitrary code execution
Product:	[Other] Security Response	Reporter:	Dhananjay Arunesh <darunesh>
Component:	vulnerability	Assignee:	Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	unspecified	CC:	andreas, carnil
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Security
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-02-26 10:28:23 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Dhananjay Arunesh 2020-02-14 12:17:51 UTC

Buffer overflow vulnerabilities were found in echoping through 6.0.2.

Reference:
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/10/19/2
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/10/21/2
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/10/21/9

Comment 1 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2020-02-16 07:27:39 UTC

Hi

This CVE was rejected, cf. https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/10/21/9 and is CVE-2010-5111.

Regards,
Salvatore

Comment 2 Dhananjay Arunesh 2020-02-26 10:28:23 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 705173 ***

Comment 3 Salvatore Bonaccorso 2020-02-27 17:29:30 UTC

Hi

I see the  issue was now marked correctly as duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705173 which references the correct CVE id to be used. Can you remove as well the (wrong) CVE reference here from description and alias?

Regards,
Salvatore

Comment 4 Dhananjay Arunesh 2020-02-28 08:00:02 UTC

In reply to comment #3:
> Hi
> 
> I see the  issue was now marked correctly as duplicate of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705173 which references the
> correct CVE id to be used. Can you remove as well the (wrong) CVE reference
> here from description and alias?
> 
> Regards,
> Salvatore

CVE removed from the flaw.