Bug 1804165

Summary:	[Samba] Upgrade is failing with Protected multilib versions: libtalloc-2.2.0-8.el7rhgs.x86_64 != libtalloc-2.1.16-1.el7.i686
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Vivek Das <vdas>
Component:	samba	Assignee:	Anoop C S <anoopcs>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Vivek Das <vdas>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rhgs-3.5	CC:	anoopcs, puebele, rcyriac, rhs-smb
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Regression, ZStream
Target Release:	RHGS 3.5.z Async Update
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libtalloc-2.2.0-9.el7rhgs	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-03-23 13:53:59 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Vivek Das 2020-02-18 11:25:33 UTC

Description of problem:

yum update to latest samba build i.e "samba-4.11.6-100" failed with multilib conflict.

Error: Protected multilib versions: libtalloc-2.2.0-8.el7rhgs.x86_64 != libtalloc-2.1.16-1.el7.i686

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL-7.8 Snapshot-3.1
samba-4.11.6-100

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. On a live system with samba ctdb installed
2. create samba latest packages repo & RHEL-7.8 Snapshot-3.1 repo
3. yum update

Actual results:
Fails with multilib conflict

Expected results:
should update successfully

Additional info:

Comment 4 Vivek Das 2020-02-20 12:58:13 UTC

Upgrade is now succeeding with the new libtalloc-2.2.0-9.el7rhgs build. Moving this bug to verified.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2020-03-23 13:53:59 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:0943