Bug 1807275

Summary: Daemon sets shows incorrect pod text
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Aritra Roy <ariroy>
Component: Dev ConsoleAssignee: Aritra Roy <ariroy>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Gajanan More <gamore>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.4CC: aos-bugs, gamore, nmukherj
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 17:21:31 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1810972    
Attachments:
Description Flags
pod ring text for daemon sets none

Description Aritra Roy 2020-02-26 01:02:21 UTC
Created attachment 1665781 [details]
pod ring text for daemon sets

Description of problem:

Pod ring text shows "Scaled to 0" for a daemon set although there are pods running

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.5.0-0.ci-2020-02-25-152421

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.create a daemon set from workloads menu in admin perspective
2.the workload for the daemon set shows the above behaviour in topology

Actual results:
the pod ring text shows "Scaled to 0" although there are pods running

Expected results:
the pod ring text should show "3 pods"

Additional info:

Comment 3 Gajanan More 2020-03-06 08:34:50 UTC
I have validated this bug on:
Build: 4.5.0-0.ci-2020-03-05-232742
Browser: Google Chrome Version 78.0.3904.108
Marking this as verified.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:21:31 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409