Bug 1807920
Summary: | [RFE] should provide a way to add quay CA in OperatorSource | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jian Zhang <jiazha> |
Component: | OLM | Assignee: | Evan Cordell <ecordell> |
OLM sub component: | OLM | QA Contact: | Jian Zhang <jiazha> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | high | ||
Priority: | high | CC: | agreene, bandrade, dmesser, kuiwang, scolange, tbuskey, xjiang |
Version: | 4.4 | Keywords: | RFE |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-02-28 13:54:10 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jian Zhang
2020-02-27 13:29:44 UTC
Hi Jian, thanks for this RFE. We are actively looking to decommission appregistry usage in OCP 4.5, so we will not invest in any additional features. The general concept of providing a pull secret alongside with the catalog is something we are working on here: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-537. It'll be for CatalogSources which is our go-forward way of representing catalogs on clusters. Hope this clarifies. PS: This RFE Jira project would also be the preferred place to file future RFEs. Hi, Daniel Thanks for your explanation! I'm not sure if the CA supporting feature should be added to OLM or CVO. If https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RFE-537 can cover this scenario, I'd glad to use it to trace this bug. If not, do I need to open another RFE in JIRA? @Jian - I think we want to push people towards hosting their own catalogs not on appregistry but with bundles and index images on their own container registries. That's why we are concentrating to make custom CA support available there and NOT on for appregistry. We are looking to deprecate OperatorSource and appregistry support. |