Bug 18112

Summary:	amanda-client is missing the /etc/xinetd.d/amanda file
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Gilbert E. Detillieux <gedetil>
Component:	amanda	Assignee:	Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	7.0	CC:	heckmann, j
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-10-02 20:20:25 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Gilbert E. Detillieux 2000-10-02 17:05:12 UTC

# rpm -qilp redhat-7.0/i386/en/RedHat/RPMS/amanda-2.4.1p1-18.i386.rpm
|fgrep inet
/etc/xinetd.d/amandaidx
# rpm -qilp
redhat-7.0/i386/en/RedHat/RPMS/amanda-client-2.4.1p1-18.i386.rpm |fgrep
inet
# rpm -qilp
/redhat-7.0/i386/en/RedHat/RPMS/amanda-server-2.4.1p1-18.i386.rpm |fgrep
inet
/etc/xinetd.d/amandaidx
/etc/xinetd.d/amidxtape
#

For some reason, the base amanda package has an amandaidx, which is
presumably a duplicate of the one that's in amanda-server, where it rightly
belongs. However, there doesn't appear to be an /etc/xinetd.d/amanda file
at all, which would presumably belong in the amanda-client package.

The amanda SRPM seems to include all 3 xinetd files, so I assume the SPEC
file is wrong.

(This bug should be assigned the component name "amanda", but it's not in
the list.)

Comment 1 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-10-02 20:20:08 UTC

Ok, it's now possible to assign bugs to amanda. Thanks for that report. I'll
assign the bug to the amanda packager.

Comment 2 Jeff Johnson 2000-10-12 18:58:27 UTC

/etc/xinetd.d/amanda added to the amanda-server package in
amanda-2.4.2-0.19991216beta1.1.

Comment 3 heckmann 2000-10-13 15:34:00 UTC

I haven't actually looked at the new amanda package in rawhide, since the
mirrors don't have it yet, but 
/etc/xinetd.d/amanda should be added to the amanda-client package not the
amanda-server package,
the server package should have /etc/xinetd.d/amandaidx and 
/etc/xinetd.d/amidxtape.

Comment 4 bradley 2000-12-17 16:31:49 UTC

The rawhide packages have not been fixed.
The amanda entry for xinetd is still in the server package when it needs to be
in the client package

Comment 5 Seth Vidal 2001-01-02 21:26:36 UTC

I would have to agree with the last poster
rawhide is still not fixed
eventhough this seems silly the below is the one line patch to correct it in the
rawhide version:

--- amanda.spec~	Thu Oct 12 16:42:34 2000
+++ amanda.spec	Tue Jan  2 13:30:17 2001
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@
 %defattr(-,root,root)
 %doc examples docs/[A-LN-Z]* docs/MULTITAPE COPYRIGHT* NEWS README SNAPSHOT
 %{_libdir}/libamserver*.so
-%config(noreplace) /etc/xinetd.d/amanda
 %config(noreplace) /etc/xinetd.d/amidxtape
 %attr(-,operator,disk)	%{_libexecdir}/amindexd
 %attr(-,operator,disk)	%{_libexecdir}/amlogroll
@@ -247,6 +246,7 @@
 %files client
 %defattr(-,root,root)
 %{_libdir}/libamclient*.so
+%config(noreplace) /etc/xinetd.d/amanda
 %attr(-,operator,disk)	%{_libexecdir}/amandad
 %attr(4750,root,disk)	%{_libexecdir}/calcsize
 %attr(4750,root,disk)	%{_libexecdir}/killpgrp