Bug 1813464
Summary: | Obsolete deprecated() virtual provide | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miroslav Suchý <msuchy> |
Component: | fedora-obsolete-packages | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 31 | CC: | j, mhroncok |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-06-05 17:03:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Miroslav Suchý
2020-03-13 21:47:04 UTC
Deprecation and having this package obsolete things aren't really linked in any meaningful way. For one, not all packages which are marked as deprecated would need to be obsoleted by this package. fedora-obsolete-packages is to be used only in the case that something has to be removed from existing systems to prevent dependency problems. That's all. Some kind of blanket obsolete of anything marked as deprecated would not be warranted even if it worked in the way you suggest. A deprecation is a promise. We promise that this will go away some time. Than we retire it (or not). Than we might need to obsolete it. |