Bug 1814045

Summary: Fixes for Flatpak OCI authenticator
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Owen Taylor <otaylor>
Component: flatpakAssignee: David King <dking>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.2CC: dking, jkoten, lmiksik, mkrajnak, tpelka
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 8.2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: flatpak-1.6.2-2.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-28 16:10:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Owen Taylor 2020-03-16 20:56:52 UTC
Testing of Flatpak-1.6 against the internal container registry, registry.redhat.io, and registry.redhat.com revealed some defects that it would be good to fix for 8.2.

 * flatpak cannot authenticate to the internal container registry, blocking testing of whether installing the Flatpaks we will ship in 8.2 from a registry works correctly:

 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/3460
 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/3461
 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/3471

 * downloading registry.redhat.io after prompting the user for username/password is twice as slow as it needs to be:

 https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/3472

Comment 2 Owen Taylor 2020-03-16 21:03:10 UTC
Switched from blocker to exception, since harm is is fairly modest:
 - installing Flatpaks from container registries would be less responsive and possibly look buggy
 - pre-release testing would be harder.

Risks of these fixes should, however, also be small - they are small self-contained patches that only affect the installing-from-OCI registries code paths.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-28 16:10:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:1767