Bug 1814285

Summary: [Backport][RHOSP13] Backport PowerMax Driver - Legacy volume not found
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Rajini Karthik <rajini.karthik>
Component: openstack-cinderAssignee: Pablo Caruana <pcaruana>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Tzach Shefi <tshefi>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Chuck Copello <ccopello>
Priority: high    
Version: 13.0 (Queens)CC: abishop, arkady_kanevsky, dcain, jvisser, kholtz, kurt_hey, mburns, morazi, pcaruana, pgrist, rajini.karthik, sam.wan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: OtherQA, Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-cinder-12.0.10-11.el7ost.noarch.rpm Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-09-03 18:24:04 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1581398, 1588541    

Description Rajini Karthik 2020-03-17 14:55:21 UTC 
Description of problem:
migrazione rhosp10-->13 problematiche cinder driver 


PowerMax Driver - Legacy volume not found

The equals check is too stringent for legacy pre Pike volumes
after an upgrade.  Pre PIke is SMI-S, Pike and later is REST
and identifier name is persisted differently.
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712714

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Alan Bishop 2020-05-26 15:14:50 UTC 
As this is a bug fix, what's the plan for backporting the fix upstream?

The version (16 Train) seems wrong, should it be 13 Queens?
Comment 2 arkady kanevsky 2020-09-03 15:56:46 UTC 
Rajini can you respond to Alan's question?

Alan,
is it planned for 16.1 z2? if not what release is it planned for?
Comment 3 Alan Bishop 2020-09-03 18:24:04 UTC 
I did some checking and learned the patch was backported to stable/queens soon enough that it was automatically included in the 13z12 release.

I also checked the OSP-16.1 code and the patch was included in the GA release.

It seems we're in good shape for both OSP-13 and OSP-16.1
Comment 4 Rajini Karthik 2020-09-08 16:15:43 UTC 
Thanks Alan. We are good on this