Bug 1814679

Summary:	[RFE][GSS] Create different sizing requirement based on cluster size
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage	Reporter:	Bipin Kunal <bkunal>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	Olive Lakra <olakra>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.3	CC:	asriram, ebenahar, etamir, kramdoss, ocs-bugs, olakra
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	OCS 4.5.0	Flags:	kramdoss: needinfo+
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1826397, 1841422

Comment 6 Elad 2020-04-24 17:43:40 UTC

Eran, Anjana,

KNIP-1430 (Support OCS in 8CPUs nodes cluster - Phase I - manual instructions) is targeted to 4.5. I see this BZ has devel_ack+ for 4.4.0. 
I think we should revert the devel_ack and retarget accordingly.

Please advice, thanks

Comment 8 Anjana Suparna Sriram 2020-04-27 06:30:33 UTC

(In reply to Elad from comment #6)
> Eran, Anjana,
> 
> KNIP-1430 (Support OCS in 8CPUs nodes cluster - Phase I - manual
> instructions) is targeted to 4.5. I see this BZ has devel_ack+ for 4.4.0. 
> I think we should revert the devel_ack and retarget accordingly.
> 
> Please advice, thanks

Moved it to 4.5.0 release

Comment 12 krishnaram Karthick 2020-08-21 10:23:18 UTC

Oliver, Which portion of the planning guide covers the changes made as part of this bug? can you help me with the sections to review?

Comment 15 krishnaram Karthick 2020-08-29 04:29:05 UTC

The changes in the resource guide looks good to me. 

@Bipin - Since you raised the request and there has been a lot of changes from the original request to actual change made, I'd like to get an ack from you as well before moving this bug to verified.