Bug 1814709
| Summary: | Setting s3 storage parameters in config.imageregistry.operator.openshift.io gets reverted | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jaspreet Kaur <jkaur> |
| Component: | Image Registry | Assignee: | Ricardo Maraschini <rmarasch> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Wenjing Zheng <wzheng> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 4.2.0 | CC: | adam.kaplan, aos-bugs, florin-alexandru.peter, mouimet, rekhan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-09-01 08:21:06 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Fixing the bug 1833109 should mitigate this problem. This has been addressed by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833109, closing this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1833109 *** *** Bug 1888936 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
Description of problem: We are using an S3 compatible storage backend and we want to use this for the image-registry as well. Setting this in config.imageregistry.operator.openshift.io - spec: storage: s3: bucket: xyz-registry region: eu-de regionEndpoint: xyz.com gets overwritten by this - spec: storage: s3: bucket: xyz-registry encrypt: true keyID: '' region: eu-de regionEndpoint: xyz.com This causes builds to fail because the registry uses encryption but the backend does not support it. Setting explicitly "encrypt: false" is overwritten to "encrypt: true", we can also see that the "generation" of the resource is incremented by 2. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Not able to use S3 storage as backend doesnt support encrypt true Expected results: Should be able to modify Additional info: