Bug 1815725

Summary: Re-Review Request: mkdocs-cinder - A clean responsive theme for the MkDocs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robin Lee <robinlee.sysu>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: José Matos <jamatos>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jamatos, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jamatos: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-25 02:22:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1811410    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 José Matos 2020-03-21 19:15:27 UTC
After mkdocs review is done I will review this package.

Comment 2 José Matos 2020-03-24 12:46:49 UTC
Fedora review complains about three things.

Two of them are true but moot:

* the name already exists because this is a re-review;
* the package does not install properly because it requires mkdocs that has just been approved.

The third is relevant:

* Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files

Replace the line

%{python3_sitelib}/*

with

%{python3_sitelib}/cinder
%{python3_sitelib}/mkdocs_cinder-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info

I did not test it but it should be something along this.

Without looking I suspect that probably the other mkdocs theme probably suffer from the same problem.

Comment 4 José Matos 2020-04-09 13:47:54 UTC
The package is simple, this is a re-review and the license is correct and acceptable.

The issue in %files has been fixed so the package is approved.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-04-14 12:33:13 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d4e501fac9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d4e501fac9

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-04-14 12:33:14 UTC
FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-04-14 16:50:37 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d4e501fac9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d4e501fac9 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d4e501fac9

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-04-15 19:57:44 UTC
FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2020-04-25 02:22:18 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d4e501fac9 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2020-04-25 03:00:36 UTC
FEDORA-2020-cd3e0f6413 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.