Bug 1816294

Summary:	Please build an EPEL8 build for rubygem-erubi
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	rubygem-erubi	Assignee:	Michel Lind <michel>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mkent, ruby-packagers-sig, strzibny, thrcka, vondruch
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	rubygem-erubi-1.7.0-1.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-04-11 19:29:09 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michel Lind 2020-03-23 18:22:01 UTC

Description of problem:
A team at work needs it, and it's already packaged for EPEL 7 but not branched for EPEL 8.

Tested rebuilding the Rawhide src.rpm and it builds fine.

If there's no interest in maintaining it, I can help maintain the EPEL 8 branch; please let me know, thanks!

FAS: salimma

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.7.0-20

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2020-03-24 08:03:34 UTC

Hello Michael,

I am not interested in EPEL, therefore I am fine if somebody else maintains any of my EPEL packages.

Nevertheless, you have not mentioned reasons you want erubis in EPEL, but because it is not maintained upstream, I would suggest against doing that. Please consider rubygem-erubi instead.

Comment 2 Michel Lind 2020-03-26 04:54:47 UTC

Hi Vit,

I'll communicate that with our internal team (not 100% familiar with their usecases either). Thanks!

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2020-03-26 23:29:50 UTC

(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #1)
> Hello Michael,
> 
> I am not interested in EPEL, therefore I am fine if somebody else maintains
> any of my EPEL packages.
> 
> Nevertheless, you have not mentioned reasons you want erubis in EPEL, but
> because it is not maintained upstream, I would suggest against doing that.
> Please consider rubygem-erubi instead.

Looks like we can go with erubi - since you also maintain it, can I get added as a committer? (I'm a provenpackager so I can commit anyway, but I prefer not to do hit-and-run commits) :)

Comment 4 Vít Ondruch 2020-03-27 07:43:24 UTC

You should have the rubygem-erubi commit bit now.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-03-27 17:57:46 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f52168f03 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f52168f03

Comment 6 Michel Lind 2020-03-27 17:59:30 UTC

Thanks Vit!

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-03-28 01:44:16 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f52168f03 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f52168f03

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-04-11 19:29:09 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f52168f03 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.