Bug 181900

Summary:	It should be Bengali (bn) Language Pack, not Bengali-India (bn_IN) Language pack
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jamil Ahmed <jamil>
Component:	openoffice.org	Assignee:	Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	sundaram
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-03-23 08:03:22 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jamil Ahmed 2006-02-17 17:27:32 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Description of problem:
We [http://www.ankurbangla.org/ and [http://bn.openoffice.org/] work for Bengali language in OpenOffice.org which is not country specific [ie, bn_BD or bn_IN].

But the RPM package distributed contains bn_IN code - which is not correct. It should be, openoffice.org-langpack-bn-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

Ref:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org-langpack-bn_IN-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qa | grep openoffice.org-langpack-bn

Actual Results:  openoffice.org-langpack-bn_IN-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

Expected Results:  openoffice.org-langpack-bn-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2006-02-20 10:38:19 UTC


These bugs are being closed since a large number of updates have been released
after the FC5 test1 and test2 releases. Kindly update your system by running yum
update as root user or try out the third and final test version of FC5 being
released in a short while and verify if the bugs are still present on the system
.Reopen or file new bug reports as appropriate after confirming the presence of
this issue. Thanks

Comment 2 Jamil Ahmed 2006-02-20 11:58:08 UTC

This bug exist in the development branch too.

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2006-02-23 10:06:56 UTC

yeah, probably should. I'll do that post fc5 as the deed is done and it's a pain
in the ass to change it right now.

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2006-03-23 08:03:22 UTC

now fixed for fc6