Bug 182126
Summary: | RFE: pirut needs to log to yum.log for auditing reasons | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jef Spaleta <jspaleta> |
Component: | pirut | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-21 23:18:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jef Spaleta
2006-02-20 18:03:01 UTC
I've added the logging to yum.log (oops, that was supposed to be there). For the summary information, let's take the discussion to fedora-devel where I responded to Willem Riede on the pirut thread and see where things go from there. I'm not *against* adding it, I just want to try to iterate through UI ideas in the most efficient way possible. You can argue about how to best expose the UI for normal usage for another month. In the meantime, very little effective testing of the group level functionality using pirut is going to be performed. Having inexperienced people using pirut pop into the lists and say they might have used pirut to remove evolution and had gnome-session get removed is very disconcerting and there is no way to follow-up with them to see if thats really what happened. Very disconcerting. I hope the extended discussion to perfect the UI is worth waiting on implementing any auditable feedback in a timeframe that would be useful for pre-release testing. -jef Added a dialog in CVS |