Bug 182227

Summary: Reporting Errors for Scim tables for Bengali
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Runa Bhattacharjee <runab>
Component: m17n-dbAssignee: Mayank Jain <majain>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: ankit, eng-i18n-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-06-02 12:52:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 126002    
Attachments:
Description Flags
corrections for bn-inscript.mim
none
corrections for bn-itrans.mim
none
corrections for bn-probhat.mim none

Description Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-02-21 06:00:05 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060130 Red Hat/1.0.7-1.4.3 Firefox/1.0.7

Description of problem:
Errors in the existing Scim tables for Bengali:
1. Inscript
2. Probhat
3. Itrans
4. Unijoy [not tested due to pending legal advise]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Activate Scim IME
2.Choose Aprropriate Language i.e. Bengali and layout
3.
  

Actual Results:  Wrong representation of a few keypoints and missing keypoints

Expected Results:  The modified keypoints have been mentioned in the attached files:
1. bn-inscript-revised.mim
2. bn-probhat-revised.mim
3. bn-itrans-revised.mim

Additional info:

Since some of the keypoints could not be keyed in, the Unicode values of the characters to be represented have been mentioned.

Comment 1 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-02-21 06:01:55 UTC
Created attachment 124939 [details]
corrections for bn-inscript.mim

Comment 2 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-02-21 06:02:33 UTC
Created attachment 124940 [details]
corrections for bn-itrans.mim

Comment 3 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-02-21 06:03:07 UTC
Created attachment 124941 [details]
corrections for bn-probhat.mim

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2006-03-01 13:29:39 UTC
Runa, could you attach the final corrected versions of the .mim files
to make it easier for me to merge in your fixes.

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2006-03-01 14:42:05 UTC
Ignore comment 4 - your changes are quite clear and well documented. :)

A couple of comments:

1) in bn-probhat-revised.mim:
  -("$" ?৳) <-- this is actually U09F3
  +("$" ?<Bangladeshi Currency symbol U09F3>)
perhaps it is a font issue?

2) in bn-itrans-revised.mim:
<!--These alphabets and dependent vowels are not used in modern bengali. Most of
the other keymaps do not provide them either--!>
<!--Not Unicode recognised codepoints--!>

So you think those mappings should be removed?

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2006-03-01 14:49:38 UTC
Also this:

  -("t.h" "à§")
  +("t.h" "<U09CE>")

is the same, no?

Comment 7 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-03-06 06:39:03 UTC
Answer to comment 5:
#1.. it looks like a font issue
#2.. better to remove as they are not in unicode anyways

Answer to comment 6:
i put that in just for clarification.. coz the box might have created a confusion.

hth
runa

Comment 8 Jens Petersen 2006-03-09 08:14:54 UTC
More questions:

1) I take it it is ok to remove these too:

  ("LLi" (delete @-) "ৢ")		; not in ITRANS Bengali table
  ("L^i" (delete @-) "ৢ")		; not in ITRANS Bengali table

?

2) These:

  ("#" "à§à¦°")				; not in ITRANS Bengali table
  ("$" "রà§")				; not in ITRANS Bengali table
  ("^" "তà§à¦°")				; not in ITRANS Bengali table
  ("*" "শà§à¦°")				; not in ITRANS Bengali table

are bad because they are combinations of codepoints?


Comment 9 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-03-09 08:22:16 UTC
1) yup. should not be a problem
2) they are not unicode recognised codepoints these are like conjuncts or
semiconjuncts someone put in as they are used a lot. no official endorsement so
far. we did not include it in iiimf-inscript either


Comment 10 Jens Petersen 2006-03-10 02:28:32 UTC
They have been removed in 1.3.3-2.

Comment 11 Runa Bhattacharjee 2006-06-02 12:52:09 UTC
Resolved.