Bug 1822753
Summary: | ostree installs fail with 'Commit metadata for runtime/org.fedoraproject.Platform/x86_64/f32 not matching expected metadata' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adam Williamson <awilliam> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Kalev Lember <klember> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, dustymabe, jkonecny, jonathan, kellin, klember, tpopela, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vponcova, walters, wwoods |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | openqa | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-05-17 05:07:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Adam Williamson
2020-04-09 18:55:49 UTC
I looked into it in the morning and https://pagure.io/flatpak-module-tools/pull-request/9 should hopefully fix this so the pull request was merged two weeks ago, but this is still broken: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/594284#step/_do_install_and_reboot/47 Log messages look just the same: 13:41:08,529 DBG payload.flatpak: Flatpak operation: install of ref runtime/org.fedoraproject.Platform/x86_64/f32 state started 13:42:01,613 WRN misc: /usr/lib64/python3.8/site-packages/pyanaconda/payload/flatpak.py:177: Warning: g_value_get_flags: assertion 'G_VALUE_HOLDS_FLAGS (value)' failed self._transaction.run() 13:42:01,633 DBG payload.flatpak: Flatpak operation: install of ref runtime/org.fedoraproject.Platform/x86_64/f32 state failed 13:42:01,633 ERR payload.flatpak: Flatpak installation failed with message: 'Commit metadata for runtime/org.fedoraproject.Platform/x86_64/f32 not matching expected metadata' -- error is fatal False 13:42:01,634 ERR payload.rpmostreepayload: Failed to install flatpaks: flatpak-error-quark: Aborted due to failure (4) What's going on? Fix didn't work? Fix isn't in effect yet? We need the fix deployed on the builders as well. I was first waiting for the infra freeze to end and then https://pagure.io/flatpak-module-tools/pull-request/10 to be merged so that we can deploy both fixes at the same time. I'll make sure this gets some traction next week. FEDORA-2020-d7afeb1476 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d7afeb1476 FEDORA-2020-5ff86c2609 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5ff86c2609 FEDORA-EPEL-2020-eb770e14c1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-eb770e14c1 FEDORA-2020-6edcc178fe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6edcc178fe OK, Fedora builds done and infra request is in to get the OSBS buildroot updated: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8907 FEDORA-2020-6edcc178fe has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-6edcc178fe` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6edcc178fe See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-5ff86c2609 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5ff86c2609` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5ff86c2609 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-d7afeb1476 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d7afeb1476` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d7afeb1476 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-eb770e14c1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-eb770e14c1 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2020-5ff86c2609 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-d7afeb1476 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2020-eb770e14c1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-6edcc178fe has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. Still working on getting the flatpak-module-tools deployed in infra. See https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8907#comment-652257 for the latest status on this. After that is done, we should be able to rebuild the runtime. OK, the fix is now deployed in infra and I'm working on rebuilding the runtimes. I'll link all of the rebuilds here (but only mark the F32 one as closing this bug as this is the one that Anaconda tries to install). FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-350bbafc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-350bbafc22 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-35790ab903 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-35790ab903 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-350bbafc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-350bbafc22 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-35790ab903 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-35790ab903 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-f273904664 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-350bbafc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-35790ab903 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. I've tested it and seems to be working fine. Even though I wasn't able to check the installed system because the installation failed on bootloader later in the process. OK, great! Thanks for testing it. |