Bug 1823910
Summary: | GNOME Contacts can't get past welcome screen | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Daniel Rusek <drusek> |
Component: | gnome-contacts | Assignee: | Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 32 | CC: | awilliam, drusek, elad, fedoraparked, gnome-sig, kevin, mail, mcatanza, robatino |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | AcceptedFreezeException | ||
Fixed In Version: | gnome-contacts-3.36-2.fc32 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-04-14 22:07:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1705305, 1705306 |
Description
Daniel Rusek
2020-04-14 19:06:37 UTC
Proposed as a Freeze Exception for 32-final by Fedora user asciiwolf using the blocker tracking app because: GNOME Contacts that is a basic, preinstalled application on Fedora Workstation, cannot get past welcome screen (which makes the application basically not working at all) on Fedora 32. This is caused by a regression that was already fixed upstream by a simple, one line fix. This fix however did not make it into Fedora in time. I'd actually say this is a release blocker, per "All applications that can be launched using the standard graphical mechanism after a default installation of Fedora Workstation on the x86_64 architecture must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test." If you can't get through the welcome wizard, you have no basic functionality. I'm +1 blocker, +1 FE if for some reason others disagree on blocker status. +1 blocker, +1 FE +1 blocker, but I don't see this being an issue for Live images (in that it doesn't seem like an application that people would use without installing) so I'm also +1 for invoking the late blocker exception. I just loaded up GNOME Contacts (gnome-contacts-3.36-1.fc32.x86_64) for the first time and was presented with the welcome screen. It asked me to select my default contact list, I picked one of my Google Accounts. It worked fine after that. Is it possible that this only affects the "local address book"? As it is, I'm disinclined to call this a blocker. I'd +1 FE it, but I don't think it alone is worth holding up the release for. Stephen: looking at the fix, yeah, it seems entirely plausible it only affects the local store. I'm still +1, though, as that's clearly basic functionality. Doesn't matter honestly. If it's a one-line fix, then a FE is sufficient here. As per the criteria in comment2 it might be a blocker, but I am definite +1 FE Marking at least accepted FE for now. A build is running ATM. FEDORA-2020-7953ad31e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7953ad31e5 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-718eb1c372 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32 Flatpaks. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-718eb1c372 FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-718eb1c372 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Flatpaks testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-718eb1c372 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-FLATPAK-2020-718eb1c372 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 Flatpaks stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2020-7953ad31e5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-7953ad31e5 FEDORA-2020-7953ad31e5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |