Bug 1826110

Summary:	Request to package ShellCheck for EPEL-8
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Graham Williamson <graham>
Component:	ShellCheck	Assignee:	greg.hellings
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	epel8	CC:	cis.support, dridi.boukelmoune, greg.hellings, jan.iven, kretschmer.jens, mail, petersen
Target Milestone:	---	Flags:	petersen: mirror+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ShellCheck-0.6.0-3.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-09-05 08:30:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Graham Williamson 2020-04-20 22:05:39 UTC

Hi,

I would like to ask for a build of ShellCheck for EPEL 8. Missing this from my CI.

Please, let me know if I can be of any help.

Thanks.

Comment 1 Jens Petersen 2020-04-21 09:51:13 UTC

Thanks!

Currently just starting finally to work on getting ghc added to EPEL8.

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2020-04-21 10:05:18 UTC

(I am not sure why the bug is assigned to greghellings?)

Comment 3 greg.hellings 2020-04-25 06:46:36 UTC

I think that I own the epel7 branch, so it defaulted the epel8 request to me? Maybe? I'm very happy to not be on any branch, frankly, as I know nothing about Haskell.

Comment 4 Jens Petersen 2020-05-19 14:00:48 UTC

(In reply to greg.hellings from comment #3)
> I think that I own the epel7 branch, so it defaulted the epel8 request to
> me? Maybe?

Ah okay, I might well have forgotten that.

I asked around apparently it is currently stored in a separate git repo,
but that is going to change.

> I'm very happy to not be on any branch, frankly, as I know
> nothing about Haskell.

Okay no worries.

Comment 5 cis.support 2020-11-17 11:25:59 UTC

Hi - just wondering if there are any plans to include this soon? Would be useful for us to have this available.

Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2022-04-02 15:09:51 UTC

Greg, could you help here by requesting an epel8 branch, please?

After that feel free to assign it back to me.
I am also happy to take over the epel branches.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2022-08-28 16:06:04 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-619c71c0b0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-619c71c0b0

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2022-08-28 23:35:44 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-619c71c0b0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-619c71c0b0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2022-09-05 08:30:37 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2022-619c71c0b0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.