Bug 1826505
Summary: | [Masters] Power Off message for node in maintenance state need a updated message referring to workloads | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | bjacot |
Component: | Console Metal3 Plugin | Assignee: | Jiri Tomasek <jtomasek> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | mlammon |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.4 | CC: | abeekhof, aos-bugs, gharden, mlammon, ukalifon |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.5.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-13 17:29:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1801238, 1840133 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
bjacot
2020-04-21 19:59:32 UTC
I can recreate this for master nodes, but it works well for worker nodes. It's also very strange that there is no "start maintenance" on master nodes from the baremetal hosts page, and you have to do the start maintenance from the nodes page and then do the power off from the hosts page, and ignore that it's telling you to start maintenance first... This is caused by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801238. It happens only on masters. Due to the fact that master Bare Metal Host is not properly assigned to the Node, the host can't see that the node is in maintenance and therefore it does not take it into account when resolving the power off situation. @Udi, not being able to start the maintenance from the master host is again caused by the same bug. The host can't 'see' its assigned node and therefore it is not possible to start its maintenance from the host. I applied the workaround scripts that were shared in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801238 and got the expected behavior. Verified: 4.5.0-0.nightly-2020-06-17-001505 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409 |