Bug 182743

Summary: Review Request: nessus-libraries
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: John Mahowald <jpmahowald>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: gajownik, imlinux
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-14 09:06:33 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779, 182744, 182941    
Attachments:
Description Flags
spec diff to enable libpcap and make buildroot consistent none

Description Andreas Bierfert 2006-02-24 13:49:41 UTC
Spec Name or Url: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/nessus-libraries.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/nessus-libraries-2.2.6-1.src.rpm
Description: Support libraries for nessus

Comment 1 Dawid Gajownik 2006-02-24 14:57:00 UTC
I've been playing with nessus some time ago. You may want to take a look at my
patches and spec files â http://fedora.pl/~gajownik/nessus/ 

IIRC nessus-plugins was not finished -- after one week of patching I was fed up ;-)
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-July/msg00380.html

Comment 2 Andreas Bierfert 2006-02-24 15:47:14 UTC
Thanks for posting... I will take a look and see what I can use/integrate if you
don't mind :)

Comment 3 Dawid Gajownik 2006-02-24 16:06:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I will take a look and see what I can use/integrate if you don't mind :)

Shure. That's the reason why I gave you link to these patches :)

Comment 4 Andreas Bierfert 2006-02-24 16:22:31 UTC
Ok here are the first tuneups :) Thanks again =)

http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/nessus-libraries.spec
http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/nessus-libraries-2.2.6-2.src.rpm

Comment 5 John Mahowald 2006-03-04 17:48:15 UTC
Why disable libpcap? It's already a BuildRequirement even.

And $RPM_BUILD_ROOT not consistent.

Otherwise looks good.

Comment 6 John Mahowald 2006-03-04 17:51:21 UTC
Created attachment 125645 [details]
spec diff to enable libpcap and make buildroot consistent

Comment 7 Dawid Gajownik 2006-03-04 18:21:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Why disable libpcap?

./configure --help

[snip]

  --enable-nessuspcap     use the libpcap that comes with this package

Well, `--disable-nessuspcap' forces nessus-libraries to use system libpcap,
which is a Good Thing⢠;-)

Comment 8 Andreas Bierfert 2006-03-07 09:18:24 UTC
Will fix the buildroot stuff. As for the libpcap Dawid is right. I'd rather use
the system one.

Any other comments?

Comment 9 John Mahowald 2006-03-14 01:32:02 UTC
Oh, I assumed the opposite for --disble-nessuspcap

Nope.

Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
* no-version-in-last-changelog, ignoring, long lines

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- post/postun ldconfig ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r 

APPROVED.

Comment 10 Andreas Bierfert 2006-03-14 09:06:33 UTC
Imported and pushed. 

Thanks for the review.