Bug 1829770
| Summary: | gpgme: FTBFS in rawhide | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcel Plch <mplch> |
| Component: | gpgme | Assignee: | Igor Raits <igor.raits> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | igor.raits, mhroncok, python-maint, tmraz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | gpgme-1.13.1-7.fc33 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-04-30 13:12:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1785415, 1803234 | ||
|
Description
Marcel Plch
2020-04-30 10:05:58 UTC
I think this is due to update of gnupg2 from 2.2.19-1.fc32 to 2.2.20-1.fc33. I'll try to check as soon as I can. Just curious, can you test it with patch from https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gpgme.git;a=commit;h=b97434fbf087f3176daf39699ff579d38d265317? Same result. The regression is happening already with gnupg-2.2.19. I've fixed it in Rawhide - the patch is from https://dev.gnupg.org/T4820 However the patch is not yet fully upstream. As I have builds of gnupg-2.2.20 for all active Fedora releases, it would be a good idea to create gpgme updates for them with the patch (just merging the master should be OK IMHO). But I am leaving that up to the gpgme maintainers decision. (In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #4) > The regression is happening already with gnupg-2.2.19. > > I've fixed it in Rawhide - the patch is from > https://dev.gnupg.org/T4820 > > However the patch is not yet fully upstream. > > As I have builds of gnupg-2.2.20 for all active Fedora releases, it would be > a good idea to create gpgme updates for them with the patch (just merging > the master should be OK IMHO). But I am leaving that up to the gpgme > maintainers decision. If you can handle this, would appreciate this much. |