Bug 1829824
Summary: | [openstack] api loadbalancer shows operating_status of DEGRADED after kuryr IPI install | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | August Simonelli <asimonel> | |
Component: | Networking | Assignee: | rdobosz | |
Networking sub component: | kuryr | QA Contact: | GenadiC <gcheresh> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | ||
Severity: | low | |||
Priority: | medium | CC: | ltomasbo, mdemaced, nsatsia, rlobillo | |
Version: | 4.4 | Keywords: | AutomationBackLog, UpcomingSprint | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | 4.5.0 | |||
Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1832872 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-13 17:33:40 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1832872 |
Description
August Simonelli
2020-04-30 12:46:49 UTC
Verified on: openshift_puddle: 4.5.0-0.nightly-2020-05-08-015855 core_puddle: RHOS_TRUNK-16.0-RHEL-8-20200506.n.2 Bootstrap port was deleted after bootstrap server destroy: (overcloud) [stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ openstack loadbalancer member list ostest-6hh74-kuryr-api-loadbalancer-pool +--------------------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+------------------+--------+ | id | name | project_id | provisioning_status | address | protocol_port | operating_status | weight | +--------------------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+------------------+--------+ | 2f69539e-7f9b-4eb4-87f3-bb10faf147b1 | ostest-6hh74-master-port-0 | bd75aa0bb30d44b08428ec24d08600fb | ACTIVE | 10.196.2.121 | 6443 | ONLINE | 100 | | 30bec695-52e0-4724-89c1-4649e33fb324 | ostest-6hh74-master-port-2 | bd75aa0bb30d44b08428ec24d08600fb | ACTIVE | 10.196.2.73 | 6443 | ONLINE | 100 | | 5b7b8dec-b815-4e35-b110-081be1f07265 | ostest-6hh74-master-port-1 | bd75aa0bb30d44b08428ec24d08600fb | ACTIVE | 10.196.2.29 | 6443 | ONLINE | 100 | +--------------------------------------+----------------------------+----------------------------------+---------------------+--------------+---------------+------------------+--------+ So now the the loadbalancer pool shows operating_status=ONLINE: (overcloud) [stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ openstack loadbalancer pool show ostest-6hh74-kuryr-api-loadbalancer-pool +----------------------+------------------------------------------+ | Field | Value | +----------------------+------------------------------------------+ | admin_state_up | True | | created_at | 2020-05-08T05:55:37 | | description | | | healthmonitor_id | d6186d83-51bf-4b4b-b810-118cff52fdd4 | | id | 0d908d6d-f6d6-4db9-b938-c6344aa42f56 | | lb_algorithm | ROUND_ROBIN | | listeners | 03f2d413-df2e-4cd9-8e81-ecfa23ca9fb2 | | loadbalancers | c54041a4-2760-4184-b05d-7a6b367c1d3e | | members | 2f69539e-7f9b-4eb4-87f3-bb10faf147b1 | | | 5b7b8dec-b815-4e35-b110-081be1f07265 | | | 30bec695-52e0-4724-89c1-4649e33fb324 | | name | ostest-6hh74-kuryr-api-loadbalancer-pool | | operating_status | ONLINE | | project_id | bd75aa0bb30d44b08428ec24d08600fb | | protocol | HTTPS | | provisioning_status | ACTIVE | | session_persistence | None | | updated_at | 2020-05-08T08:35:09 | | tls_container_ref | None | | ca_tls_container_ref | None | | crl_container_ref | None | | tls_enabled | False | +----------------------+------------------------------------------+ Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409 |