Bug 1830530

Summary: request to re-introduce functionality - dnf [config-manager] --enable/disablerepo a-repo,b-repo,some*
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: lejeczek <peljasz>
Component: dnfAssignee: Nicola Sella <nsella>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 32CC: carl, dmach, jmracek, jrohel, mblaha, mhatina, nsella, packaging-team-maint, pkratoch, rpm-software-management, vmukhame
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: dnf-4.4.0-1.fc32 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-18 15:49:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description lejeczek 2020-05-02 14:39:41 UTC
Description of problem:

Same as yum is capable of.

many thanks, L.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Nicola Sella 2020-05-04 12:45:36 UTC
Hello, could you please be more precise on your request? The options --enable/--set-enable and --disable/--set-disable for config-manager are currently implemented.

If this was not what you asked please, update with more info. Thank you.

Comment 2 lejeczek 2020-05-06 12:11:27 UTC
Hi.
Yes, further down the cmd line args. With 'yum' we could, maybe still can, do:

yum-config-manager --disable one,two,three\* (those ',' give a nice one-liner(s))

regards,L.

Comment 3 Nicola Sella 2020-05-11 17:06:30 UTC
PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf-plugins-core/pull/397
test: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/828

note:
it is already possible to run dnf config-manager --enable repo1 repo2 
now dnf config-manager --enable repo1, repo2 works too

Comment 4 lejeczek 2020-05-11 17:31:02 UTC
And I wonder when would that trickle down to what is in OSes' repos?

This does not do anything:

$ dnf config-manager --disablerepo PowerTools,Stream-PowerTools --save
nor this:
$ dnf config-manager --disablerepo PowerTools Stream-PowerTools --save

and this:

$ dnf config-manager --set-disabled PowerTools,Stream-PowerTools --save
Error: No matching repo to modify: PowerTools,Stream-PowerTools.

That is with version 4.2.17 which in that respect feels bit messy.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-10-08 11:59:15 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-10-08 12:00:14 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-10-08 22:19:38 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-10-12 21:15:47 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2020-10-12 21:23:23 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2020-10-12 22:45:09 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2020-10-13 20:18:06 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2020-10-18 15:49:10 UTC
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2020-10-19 16:53:24 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2020-10-20 14:22:42 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 15 Carl George 🤠 2020-10-25 02:56:30 UTC
@lejeczek

> And I wonder when would that trickle down to what is in OSes' repos?

This bug is for Fedora.  To request backporting this to CentOS Stream, please open a new bugzilla against the "CentOS Stream" version of the "Red Hat Enterprise 8" product, as described in the FAQ [0].  I agree that it would be a good feature, but it's not up to me.

> This does not do anything:
> 
> $ dnf config-manager --disablerepo PowerTools,Stream-PowerTools --save
> nor this:
> $ dnf config-manager --disablerepo PowerTools Stream-PowerTools --save

Those commands don't do anything because `--disablerepo` is a top level dnf flag that temporarily disables a repo for the duration of the transaction [1].  Combining it with the `--save` flag has no effect.  It is not the same as the config-manager plugin `--disable` flag [2].  That flag does accept a space separated list of repos, or being passed multiple times.

    dnf config-manager --disable PowerTools Stream-PowerTools
    dnf config-manager --disable PowerTools --disable Stream-PowerTools


[0] https://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOSStream#Where_do_I_report_bugs.3F
[1] https://www.mankier.com/8/dnf#--disablerepo
[2] https://www.mankier.com/8/dnf-config-manager#--disable

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2020-10-27 01:20:42 UTC
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.