|Summary:||FTI: upm: upm-devel|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Igor Raits <igor.raits>|
|Component:||upm||Assignee:||Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||upm-2.0.0-6.fc32||Doc Type:||If docs needed, set a value|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2020-05-22 05:30:23 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Igor Raits 2020-05-06 04:49:35 UTC
Hello, Your package (upm) Fails To Install in Fedora 33: --- can't install upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64: - nothing provides pkgconfig(jpeg) needed by upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64 --- According to a policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks if you won't reply to this bug. The data was generated from koji buildroot, so it might be a bit newer than latest rawhide compose. Thanks!
Comment 1 Igor Raits 2020-05-13 05:23:20 UTC
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).
Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2020-05-13 09:30:18 UTC
Investigating, I think this was from changes Miro made due to nodejs issues due to swig not supporting newer versions of nodejs
Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2020-05-13 09:32:37 UTC
actually no, it's something around libjpeg. In the package the devel has the following requires: Requires: libjpeg-turbo-devel But on install I get: # dnf install upm-devel Last metadata expiration check: 0:30:13 ago on Wed 13 May 2020 10:00:11 BST. Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides pkgconfig(jpeg) needed by upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc32.i686 - nothing provides pkgconfig(jpeg) needed by upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc32.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) so I have no idea why the auto build requires adds this.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-05-13 13:05:53 UTC
FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e06d324248
Comment 5 Peter Robinson 2020-05-13 14:47:05 UTC
*** Bug 1834129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Igor Raits 2020-05-13 18:36:29 UTC
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (firstname.lastname@example.org). All subpackages of a package agaisnt which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 33. Thanks for taking care of it!
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-05-14 04:31:27 UTC
FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-e06d324248` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-05-22 05:30:23 UTC
FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.