Bug 1832094

Summary:	FTI: upm: upm-devel
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Igor Raits <igor.raits>
Component:	upm	Assignee:	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	pbrobinson
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	upm-2.0.0-6.fc32	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-05-22 05:30:23 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1750909

Description Igor Raits 2020-05-06 04:49:35 UTC

Hello,

Your package (upm) Fails To Install in Fedora 33:

---
can't install upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64:
  - nothing provides pkgconfig(jpeg) needed by upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc33.x86_64
---

According to a policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks if you won't reply to this bug.

The data was generated from koji buildroot, so it might be a bit newer than latest rawhide compose.

Thanks!

Comment 1 Igor Raits 2020-05-13 05:23:20 UTC

Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2020-05-13 09:30:18 UTC

Investigating, I think this was from changes Miro made due to nodejs issues due to swig not supporting newer versions of nodejs

Comment 3 Peter Robinson 2020-05-13 09:32:37 UTC

actually no, it's something around libjpeg. In the package the devel has the following requires:

Requires: libjpeg-turbo-devel

But on install I get:
# dnf install upm-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:30:13 ago on Wed 13 May 2020 10:00:11 BST.
Error: 
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides pkgconfig(jpeg) needed by upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc32.i686
  - nothing provides pkgconfig(jpeg) needed by upm-devel-2.0.0-5.fc32.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

so I have no idea why the auto build requires adds this.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-05-13 13:05:53 UTC

FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e06d324248

Comment 5 Peter Robinson 2020-05-13 14:47:05 UTC

*** Bug 1834129 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Igor Raits 2020-05-13 18:36:29 UTC

Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain).

All subpackages of a package agaisnt which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 33.

Thanks for taking care of it!

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-05-14 04:31:27 UTC

FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-e06d324248`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-e06d324248

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-05-22 05:30:23 UTC

FEDORA-2020-e06d324248 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.