Bug 1833309

Summary: S3 HEAD/GET operations on objects that do not match the lifecycle rule return x-amz-expiration header
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Component: RGWAssignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Tejas <tchandra>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.3CC: cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, hyelloji, jbrier, kbader, mbenjamin, sweil, tchandra, tserlin, xuchen334
Target Milestone: z1   
Target Release: 4.1   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-14.2.8-75.el8cp, ceph-14.2.8-76.el7cp Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Lifecycle expiration is reported correctly for objects Previously, incorrect lifecycle expiration could be reported for some objects, due to the presence of a prefix rule. This was caused because the optional prefix restriction in lifecycle expiration rules was ignored when generating expiration headers used in S3 HEAD and GET requests. In {storage-product} 4.1z1, the rule prefix is now part of the expiration header rule matching and lifecycle expiration for objects is reported correctly.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1786226 Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-20 14:21:03 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1786226    
Bug Blocks: 1816167    

Comment 2 Matt Benjamin (redhat) 2020-06-22 15:02:37 UTC
*** Bug 1828787 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-20 14:21:03 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:3003