Bug 1833987

Summary:	FTI: lmms: lmms
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Igor Raits <igor.raits>
Component:	lmms	Assignee:	Igor Raits <igor.raits>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	thomas.moschny
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-05-18 05:26:10 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1750909, 1803235

Description Igor Raits 2020-05-11 06:49:49 UTC

Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain).

Your package (lmms) Fails To Install in Fedora 32:

can't install lmms:
  - nothing provides lmms-vst = 1.1.3-15.fc32 needed by lmms-1.1.3-15.fc32.x86_64
  
If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/

Thanks!

Comment 1 Thomas Moschny 2020-05-11 08:46:58 UTC

Hi Igor,

I think this bug is bogus. lmms.x86_64 (intentionally) depends on lmms-vst.i686. I was able to install it on my F32 without problems, just checked.

(And I guess that also holds for bug 1832455, although I did not explicitly tested it yet.)

Comment 2 Igor Raits 2020-05-11 08:54:10 UTC

Hi Thomas, the multilib is tricky, I'll add it to the whitelist later this week.

Comment 3 Thomas Moschny 2020-05-11 09:08:01 UTC

JFTR: The whitelist currently seems to be here: https://pagure.io/pungi/blob/master/f/share/multilib/runtime-whitelist.conf

Comment 4 Igor Raits 2020-05-11 09:52:26 UTC

Nice, did not know about that list. Though that is not very helpful for me because that only lists 32bit binary packages which others can use.

Comment 5 Igor Raits 2020-05-15 16:13:05 UTC

*** Bug 1832455 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Igor Raits 2020-05-15 16:13:47 UTC

Promise that I'll add some whitelist for this, so assigning to myself for now.

Comment 7 Igor Raits 2020-05-18 05:26:10 UTC

I added this to my whitelist, so should not be a problem anymore.