Bug 1835368
| Summary: | operator_etcd-operatortype: 'Warning' reason: 'UnhealthyEtcdMember' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Kirsten Garrison <kgarriso> |
| Component: | Etcd Operator | Assignee: | Sam Batschelet <sbatsche> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | ge liu <geliu> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.5 | CC: | pasik |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-05-14 13:43:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Just updating that after bringing up a clusterbot cluster I am seeing notifications of unhealthy etcd members without doing anything to the cluster, the cluster was brought up with the latest on aws (https://openshift-release.svc.ci.openshift.org/releasetag/4.5.0-0.ci-2020-05-13-171404) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1832986 *** |
While investigating our broken ci I came across consistent messages of 259 times in one log: ``` I0513 14:43:10.700698 1 event.go:278] Event(v1.ObjectReference{Kind:"Deployment", Namespace:"openshift-etcd-operator", Name:"etcd-operator", UID:"bed768d5-a918-42a9-a836-096fa5f511be", APIVersion:"apps/v1", ResourceVersion:"", FieldPath:""}): type: 'Warning' reason: 'UnhealthyEtcdMember' unhealthy members: etcd-bootstrap,ci-op-wmnxm-m-0.c.openshift-gce-devel-ci.internal ``` In our failed runs: https://storage.googleapis.com/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_machine-config-operator/1728/pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op/2214/artifacts/e2e-gcp-op/pods/openshift-etcd-operator_etcd-operator-647b7c8bf-t577d_operator.log (from https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_machine-config-operator/1728/pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op/2214/artifacts/e2e-gcp-op/pods/) Another example: https://storage.googleapis.com/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_machine-config-operator/1724/pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op/2215/artifacts/e2e-gcp-op/pods/openshift-etcd-operator_etcd-operator-5759786ffc-4ncd2_operator.log (from https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_machine-config-operator/1724/pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op/2215/artifacts/e2e-gcp-op/pods/) However looking at out passing runs we don't even have logs for openshift-etcd-operator in the list of pods? (https://gcsweb-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/gcs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_machine-config-operator/1727/pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-release-4.2-e2e-gcp-op/80/artifacts/e2e-gcp-op/pods/) Is something causing this? Why would the member be unhealthy? Is this networking related?