Bug 1836147

Summary:	Please provide a EL8 build
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Marc Dequènes (Duck) <duck>
Component:	http-parser	Assignee:	Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	33	CC:	igor.raits, lkundrak, mrunge, sgallagh, vascom2
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-11-05 06:29:23 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1809314
Bug Blocks:

Description Marc Dequènes (Duck) 2020-05-15 09:15:01 UTC

Description of problem:
I plan to introduce postfix-mta-sts-resolver in Fedora very soon and this is a dependency (via python-aiohttp).

I'm working in the OSPO Comminfra Team and if we also use Fedora sometimes we mainly use EL8 in our infra and this is really needed.

It rebuilds fine without any change: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/duck/osas-infra-team-rpm-repo-devel/build/1387350/

Comment 1 Igor Raits 2020-05-15 09:21:02 UTC

I've added you as co-maintainer and made you default assignee for EPEL bugs. Feel free to request branch and do builds, just make sure to not merge any EPEL changes into master branch.

Comment 2 Stephen Gallagher 2020-05-15 11:10:23 UTC

http-parser 2.8.0 is included in RHEL 8 already (among other things, it's a dependency of SSSD). Is the problem that 2.8.0 is too old? If so, you have two options:

1) File a Red Hat Enterprise Linux bug and ask for the package to be updated to a newer release.

2) Build postfix-mta-sts-resolver as a module and include a newer version of http-parser in the module description.

Comment 3 Stephen Gallagher 2020-05-15 11:31:08 UTC

Ah, I see the real problem: RHEL is shipping the runtime package but not the -devel package. So this is similar to BZ #1759510

Unfortunately, that BZ (and this one) is currently blocked on BZ #1809314 (a bug in DNF) that prevents the EPEL -devel package from installing.

Comment 4 Marc Dequènes (Duck) 2020-05-19 09:10:21 UTC

Thanks Stephen. Please keep us updated.

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2020-08-11 15:27:45 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 33 development cycle.
Changing version to 33.

Comment 6 Ben Cotton 2021-11-04 17:36:17 UTC

This message is a reminder that Fedora 33 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 33 on 2021-11-30.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '33'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 33 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 7 Marc Dequènes (Duck) 2021-11-05 06:29:23 UTC

Once again another bug fixed without closing/notifying.