Bug 1837757

Summary: Review Request: python-threadpoolctl - Thread-pool Controls
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: mhroncok, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: mhroncok: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-27 12:34:30 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1836744    

Description Sergio Pascual 2020-05-19 22:13:01 UTC
Spec URL: https://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/python-threadpoolctl.spec
SRPM URL: https://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/python-threadpoolctl-2.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
Description: Python helpers to limit the number of threads used in the 
threadpool-backed of common native libraries used for scientific computing 
and data science (e.g. BLAS and OpenMP).
Fine control of the underlying thread-pool size can be useful in 
workloads that involve nested parallelism so as to mitigate 
oversubscription issues.
Fedora Account System Username: sergiopr

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2020-05-21 07:52:26 UTC
spec sanity:

1)

%{python3_sitelib}/__pycache__/*.pyc
%{python3_sitelib}/threadpoolctl.py

This can be replaced by:

%pycached %{python3_sitelib}/threadpoolctl.py


running fedora review

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2020-05-21 07:56:55 UTC
This package is APPROVED.


You SHOULD add a %check section (and I strongly suggest you do).



Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated





===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
     License".
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
     packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
     versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
     use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python3-threadpoolctl-2.0.0-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
          python-threadpoolctl-2.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
python3-threadpoolctl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US threadpool -> thread pool, thread-pool, threadlike
python3-threadpoolctl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oversubscription -> over subscription, over-subscription, oversubscribe
python-threadpoolctl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US threadpool -> thread pool, thread-pool, threadlike
python-threadpoolctl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oversubscription -> over subscription, over-subscription, oversubscribe
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
python3-threadpoolctl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US threadpool -> thread pool, thread-pool, threadlike
python3-threadpoolctl.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oversubscription -> over subscription, over-subscription, oversubscribe
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/t/threadpoolctl/threadpoolctl-2.0.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 48b3e3e9ee079d6b5295c65cbe255b36a3026afc6dde3fb49c085cd0c004bbcf
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 48b3e3e9ee079d6b5295c65cbe255b36a3026afc6dde3fb49c085cd0c004bbcf


Requires
--------
python3-threadpoolctl (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)



Provides
--------
python3-threadpoolctl:
    python-threadpoolctl
    python3-threadpoolctl
    python3.8-threadpoolctl
    python3.8dist(threadpoolctl)
    python3dist(threadpoolctl)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.0 (fed5495) last change: 2019-03-17
Command line :try-fedora-review -b 1837757 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Python, Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Ruby, Haskell, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ocaml, fonts, C/C++, Java
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-05-21 17:00:37 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-threadpoolctl

Comment 4 Miro Hrončok 2020-05-25 13:02:21 UTC
This comment is mass posted to all bugs blocking the Python 3.9 tracker, sorry if it is not 100 % relevant. When in doubt, please ask.


The Python 3.9 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag.

If you fix this bug, please don't rebuild the package in regular rawhide, but do it in the side tag with:

    $ fedpkg build --target=f33-python

The rebuild is progressing slowly and it is possible this package won't have all the required build dependencies yet. If that's the case, please just leave the fix committed and pushed and we will eventually rebuild it for you.

You are not asked to go and try rebuild all the missing dependencies yourself. If you know there is a bootstrap loop in the dependencies, let me know and we can untangle it together.

If you want to test your fix or reproduce the failure, you can still use the Copr repo mentioned in the initial comment of this bug: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/