Bug 1839011
| Summary: | [DDF] Better to use 512 GiB, 2 TiB or 4 TiB as example. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage | Reporter: | Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot> |
| Component: | documentation | Assignee: | Erin Donnelly <edonnell> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Neha Berry <nberry> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.3 | CC: | bkunal, edonnell, nberry, ocs-bugs, olakra, prsurve, sagrawal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-09-20 15:21:43 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1849769 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
Based on COmment #5 and below snip copied from Deployment Guide One more change needed in Section 2.5 Step 6, as example block shows size as 100Gi >> Section 2.5 - [1] [1] - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/4.4/html-single/deploying_openshift_container_storage/index?lb_target=preview#creating-openshift-container-storage-cluster-on-vmware_aws-vmware >> Step 6. Create StorageCluster CR ocs-cluster-service-VMware.yaml that uses the monDataDirHostPath and localblock StorageClass. kind: StorageCluster requests: >> storage: 100Gi <--change it to 2Ti ______________________________________________________________________________ >> Step 5: Check the PVs that are created with the Available status. Confirmed that changes in Step 5 of Section 2.5 is as per the ask """"" Example output: NAME CAPACITY ACCESS MODES RECLAIM POLICY STATUS CLAIM STORAGECLASS REASON AGE local-pv-150fdc87 2TiB RWO Delete Available localblock 2m11s local-pv-183bfc0a 2TiB RWO Delete Available localblock 2m11s local-pv-b2f5cb25 2TiB RWO Delete Available localblock 2m21s In this example, three PVs are used for OSD storage. """"""""""""" Raised BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1854088 for addressing Comment#7 |
Better to use 512 GiB, 2 TiB or 4 TiB as example. and this should be in sync with other steps in the chapter. 1) in the chapter 1.2.5, as per step 1 and 3, 3 disks are being passed but in the step 8 we have displayed 6 PV 2) In the chapter 1.2.4, in step 8 example output, PV shown is of 100GB but in step 9 we are creating device set of 2TiB storageDeviceSets . storage: 2Ti . Reported by: rhn-support-bkunal https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/4.3/html/deploying_openshift_container_storage/deploying-openshift-container-storage#annotations:c5000d69-af05-423c-a1e2-59e60ca0fbe9