Bug 183902
Summary: | After installation rpm database has duplicate entries for many packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Toby Ovod-Everett <toby> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-03-03 17:03:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Toby Ovod-Everett
2006-03-03 15:43:56 UTC
Try rpm --qf '%%{name}-%%{version}-%%{release}.%%{arch}' -qa or yum list installed You are installing on x86_64 so you'll have biarch library packages. I think your are just getting confused by the default output. You are indeed correct. My bad. I apologize for the false alarm. On another note, would it make sense to change the default format for x86_64 (and other platforms that have biarch library packages) to include the {arch} parameter? I'm guessing there are compatibility issues with this, but as a long-time RedHat/Fedora user with an intermediate skill set, it definitely through me for a loop when I had trouble trying to uninstall modules that showed up with the same name when I did a rpm -qa. |