Bug 1839698
| Summary: | Error when working with folio files outside of /tmp directory | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Jan Kurik <jkurik> |
| Component: | pcp | Assignee: | Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jan Kurik <jkurik> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 8.3 | CC: | agerstmayr, jkurik, mgoodwin, nathans, patrickm |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Bugfix, Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | pcp-5.2.1 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-05-18 15:19:32 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jan Kurik
2020-05-25 09:30:40 UTC
The problem occurs due to the 'dir' prefix (of the path to the folio) being prepended to each archive path in the folio, which fails when those paths are absolute paths rather than relative. The folio may contain absolute paths if the original mkaf specifies absolute paths, as was done in the reproducer steps in Comment#0. Resolved with the following upstream commit and QA updates for pcp-5.2.1: commit 70c77e6107aaf654e3cbaefc41e655e68583b934 (upstream-goodwinos/master) Author: Mark Goodwin <mgoodwin> Date: Wed Sep 23 11:44:37 2020 +1000 libpcp: handle absolute paths to archives when using --archive-folio Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (pcp bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1754 |