Bug 1841611
Summary: | Fedora DC based app pods on the stopped worker node failed to reach running state on the new node | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage | Reporter: | Prasad Desala <tdesala> |
Component: | csi-driver | Assignee: | Niels de Vos <ndevos> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Elad <ebenahar> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.4 | CC: | madam, muagarwa, ocs-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Automation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-12 13:09:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Prasad Desala
2020-05-29 14:28:55 UTC
Warning FailedAttachVolume 20m attachdetach-controller Multi-Attach error for volume "pvc-d64c1f43-e14b-46b7-8c40-ef0316ba8639" Volume is already used by pod(s) pod-test-rbd-9cb5a95ea8114995883f664d7dfdc5c1-1-2swbx Indeed this is working as per current design. Unless there is an acknowledgment in the API object for removal of pod/node ..etc, the switch will be difficult/risky and this is an extra measure to make sure we don't land on data corruption..etc. However, we are also looking into the improvements we could think of. The fencing of the node is one solution as "Cloud Providers" does. Niels, I am assigning this bug to you based on the experiments you are planning in this area. Please feel free to reassign if required. Discussed with Niels, this is not soemthing which can be done in 4.5 (or near future). Can be moved out. This is not much different from https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845666 (In reply to Mudit Agarwal from comment #5) > This is not much different from > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845666 So why not close as dup? As Humble mentioned that this issue can be resolved with node fencing, I am duping this bug to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845666. Though this is an older bug and the other one should have been duped here but https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1845666 was specifically opened to address node fencing in ceph-csi and carries a lot more details about the problem hence duping this one there. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1845666 *** |