Bug 1843162
Summary: | Creating Replication Manager fails if uid=repman is used | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | mreynolds |
Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | mreynolds |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | RHDS QE <ds-qe-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.1 | CC: | atolani, ds-qe-bugs, mmuehlfe, nkinder, pasik, spichugi, tbordaz, vashirov |
Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | sync-to-jira | ||
Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-1.4-8030020200605214214.618f7055 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Cause: Trying to create a replication manager using the attribute "uid" as the RDN of the entry
Consequence: The manager entry fails to be added.
Fix: Allow uid as the RDN of the replication manager entry
Result: You can use "cn" or "uid" for the replication manager entry
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1654226 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2020-11-04 03:08:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1654226 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
mreynolds
2020-06-02 17:57:32 UTC
Build tested: 389-ds-base-1.4.3.8-5.module+el8.3.0+7569+08175a8a.x86_64 # dsconf -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w password server-rhel8 replication enable --suffix="dc=example,dc=com" --role="master" --replica-id=1 --bind-dn="uid=repman,cn=config" --bind-passwd="password" Replication successfully enabled for "dc=example,dc=com" # ldapsearch -xLLL -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w password -b cn=config 'uid=repman' dn: uid=repman,cn=config objectClass: top objectClass: inetUser objectClass: netscapeServer objectClass: nsAccount cn: repman uid: repman userPassword:: e1BCS0RGMl9TSEEyNTZ9QUFBSUFGSlhtaCthOTl1UXUvd0dsak5RK1ZIUjRwUkl ZRW51c2NyQXRKVUwza2hKOTRSL0xyUTVZWjk4ZXd6MHhVSE54amZJTytpblNlU0hIZWtWNmZ2a01S eFBLTjRyMFdzcGRwMlcxcWJTOUVPbUMvdDdrUVF1dTdJU1NFTFJRRGVDUkhwSkVyWFVGVG5aK1JwN G1UcE83eFQxUDBpSjlRR0Jwak1Sc0E3U01NdEZhekZrUjZpSUVhMmNQUEN6QUw1b3dpY01aUnZGbX MvV3I1dGlHRzRFNTlrcW1IZU9vSzZkVllqMnJ1TmRKOStJd3cvNlVHdGw0UmlYZ09yVCtsb3FaaHp TcVJaVmdGMTU0Z29COFNHQ0ZtRUR4RDBYcTdwMmcrbWdxdi9mYkgwWFZnTXdaMVliWGU5cU9oQ3ov TlllUGF5Si9mN2h3VEFGRWtuTXVidEZwQ05jeW9lbzg3UFB0NGh6K2N6WmNJMEs2SzJGSklsRjZQS ElwWS81WGNHVUtJd1cxelpkR0hLWGlYSU5ObWloY2tnR0VYUmpoQXB1UWNFK2U3K2dLVEh5 Entry is created successfully, marking as VERIFIED. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (389-ds:1.4 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:4695 |