Bug 1843271

Summary: The fluentd couldn't be started when using init-container
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: OpenShift BugZilla Robot <openshift-bugzilla-robot>
Component: LoggingAssignee: ewolinet
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Anping Li <anli>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 4.5CC: aos-bugs, bparees, jcantril, mifiedle, scuppett
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: TestBlocker
Target Release: 4.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 17:42:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1840274    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 Jeff Cantrill 2020-06-03 15:36:49 UTC
Upgrading severity since workaround can be annoying.  We should attempt to address in 4.5.0

Comment 2 Ben Parees 2020-06-11 13:41:45 UTC
raising to high since this bug has loss of data associated with it.

Comment 7 Anping Li 2020-06-22 07:22:38 UTC
The CSV bundles are not ready.

Comment 10 Anping Li 2020-06-23 02:52:41 UTC
oc logs fluentd-k6t8c -c fluentd-init
./wait_for_es_version.sh: line 3: ruby: command not found

Comment 11 Anping Li 2020-06-23 03:39:13 UTC
 wait_for_es_version.sh should be executed when deploying fluentd only too.

Comment 12 Anping Li 2020-06-23 03:46:43 UTC
should be executed ---> shouldn't be executed

Comment 13 ewolinet 2020-06-23 16:51:38 UTC
@Anping,

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843271#c11 seems to be covered by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1850076

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1843271#c10 seems to be an issue with sourcing ruby for our downstream image, i'll investigate.

Comment 15 Anping Li 2020-06-24 02:32:06 UTC
The fix has been verified on 4.6. Waiting for the PR merge.

Comment 17 Jeff Cantrill 2020-06-25 11:15:23 UTC
*** Bug 1850725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 18 Anping Li 2020-06-25 14:56:40 UTC
Verified on elasticsearch-operator.4.5.0-202006241631.p0 clusterlogging.4.5.0-202006241631.p0

Comment 19 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:42:56 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409