Bug 1845711
Summary: | Elasticsearch upgrade from 4.4 to 4.5 fails because of disabled transient shard allocation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Jeff Cantrill <jcantril> |
Component: | Logging | Assignee: | Jeff Cantrill <jcantril> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Qiaoling Tang <qitang> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.5 | CC: | aos-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.6.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | No Doc Update | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-10-27 16:06:02 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jeff Cantrill
2020-06-09 20:54:48 UTC
Blocked by an OLM bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846316 when upgrading from Logging 4.4 to 4.5 on OCP 4.5. I am trying to see if we can overcome it by an OCP 4.4 to 4.5 cluster upgrade. $ oc exec elasticsearch-cdm-vx0f1dvs-1-76ddbb85b4-nvd4j -- es_util --query=_cluster/settings |jq Defaulting container name to elasticsearch. Use 'oc describe pod/elasticsearch-cdm-vx0f1dvs-1-76ddbb85b4-nvd4j -n openshift-logging' to see all of the containers in this pod. { "persistent": { "cluster": { "routing": { "allocation": { "enable": "all" } } }, "discovery": { "zen": { "minimum_master_nodes": "2" } } }, "transient": {} } Verified with quay.io/openshift/origin-elasticsearch-operator@sha256:65dfb97c1b787f53860455fbc6595a6b3211e30b564e04b84dde70ab125aa00d. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 GA Images), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4196 |