Bug 1848738
| Summary: | remove pvc name from example prometheus storage config | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Paul Gier <pgier> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Paul Needle <pneedle> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 4.5 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, juzhao |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.5.z | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-04-29 15:24:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Paul Gier
2020-06-18 20:46:50 UTC
@Paul
I don't it is a good solution, two reasons:
1. since the bug is fixed in 4.4.9 and higher version, only exists in 4.4.0-4.4.8, if we want to change the 4.4 doc, there are also other parts should be changed, example, step 2 of 4.4 doc
**************************
volumeClaimTemplate:
metadata:
name: <PVC_name_prefix>
4.4 doc: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.4/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring
2. for consistency, we should also change 4.1/4.2/4.3 doc, otherwise if customer configured the volumeClaimTemplate.metadata.name in these versions and upgrade to [4.4.0,4.4.8], they still would meet the issue
4.1 doc: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.3/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring
4.2 doc:https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring
4.3 doc: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring
I should keep the doc unchanged, and advise customer upgrade to 4.4.9 and higher version. WDYT?
@Junqi I get your point, but I'd prefer that we remove it for all versions since it's not necessary. And it should be a very uncommon use case that a customer would want/need to use a name other than the default. (In reply to Paul Gier from comment #2) > @Junqi I get your point, but I'd prefer that we remove it for all versions > since it's not necessary. And it should be a very uncommon use case that a > customer would want/need to use a name other than the default. Thanks,it makes sense, then we should update 4.4 doc first, then update 4.1 - 4.3 docs Pull request: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/32016. The PR applies to branch/enterprise-4.5 only, because the volume claim template name has been removed from the examples in the equivalent section for 4.6 onward already. Updated content is now available in the following: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.5/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring |