Bug 1848738
Summary: | remove pvc name from example prometheus storage config | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Paul Gier <pgier> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Paul Needle <pneedle> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 4.5 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, juzhao |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.5.z | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-04-29 15:24:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Paul Gier
2020-06-18 20:46:50 UTC
@Paul I don't it is a good solution, two reasons: 1. since the bug is fixed in 4.4.9 and higher version, only exists in 4.4.0-4.4.8, if we want to change the 4.4 doc, there are also other parts should be changed, example, step 2 of 4.4 doc ************************** volumeClaimTemplate: metadata: name: <PVC_name_prefix> 4.4 doc: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.4/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring 2. for consistency, we should also change 4.1/4.2/4.3 doc, otherwise if customer configured the volumeClaimTemplate.metadata.name in these versions and upgrade to [4.4.0,4.4.8], they still would meet the issue 4.1 doc: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.3/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring 4.2 doc:https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring 4.3 doc: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.1/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring I should keep the doc unchanged, and advise customer upgrade to 4.4.9 and higher version. WDYT? @Junqi I get your point, but I'd prefer that we remove it for all versions since it's not necessary. And it should be a very uncommon use case that a customer would want/need to use a name other than the default. (In reply to Paul Gier from comment #2) > @Junqi I get your point, but I'd prefer that we remove it for all versions > since it's not necessary. And it should be a very uncommon use case that a > customer would want/need to use a name other than the default. Thanks,it makes sense, then we should update 4.4 doc first, then update 4.1 - 4.3 docs Pull request: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/32016. The PR applies to branch/enterprise-4.5 only, because the volume claim template name has been removed from the examples in the equivalent section for 4.6 onward already. Updated content is now available in the following: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.5/monitoring/cluster_monitoring/configuring-the-monitoring-stack.html#configuring-a-local-persistent-volume-claim_configuring-monitoring |