Bug 1849712
| Summary: | Request to add iperf to EPEL 8 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Enrique <cquike> |
| Component: | iperf | Assignee: | Gabriel Somlo <somlo> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | epel8 | CC: | davide, haresh.sakariya, pasik, somlo, ssahani, strobert |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | iperf-2.1.6-2.el9 iperf-2.1.6-2.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-02-05 01:36:19 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1914423 | ||
|
Description
Enrique
2020-06-22 15:49:18 UTC
I tried (on my Fedora 32 machine) to run:
mock -r rhlepel-8-x86_64 iperf-2.0.13-4.fc32.src.rpm
to see if the package would even build properly, before requesting a branch or anything fancy like that.
What I got was:
ERROR: /etc/pki/entitlment is not a directory, is subscription-manager installed?
I don't think I'll personally be able to help in this instance, so anyone with a valid rhel subscription wanting to be a co-maintainer should feel welcome to jump in...
*** Bug 2048859 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Will you be able to branch and build iperf in epel8? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel8. (In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #3) > Will you be able to branch and build iperf in epel8? > The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer > if you do not wish to build it on epel8. I like to build locally to ensure things work, rather than have to bump revisions several times when koji builds fail. Since I can't build locally for epel8 (see comment #1 above), I'm perfectly OK with adding co-maintainer(s) who are equipped to do so. Let me know who to add to the iperf membership list at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/iperf. Actually, I just noticed, Steven Roberts (cc-ed) is the "main admin", so let's give him a chance to chime in before we do anything :) Steven, any thoughts? Sure thing. You should be able to do local builds for EPEL 8 using the almalinux-8-x86_64 chroot (as you've noticed, the rhepel one requires a valid subscription to work). If you want to add the EPEL Packagers SIG as a co-maintainer add the epel-packagers-sig group through https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/<package>/addgroup and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches. Thanks! Wasn't aware of the `almalinux-*` chroot, and that it "fits" epel -- thanks for that! Seems to build the current iperf srpm without problems. https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41785 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41786 Once those go through, I'll request builds, and see how it goes from there. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3d01597e0b has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3d01597e0b FEDORA-EPEL-2022-19dddb1202 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-19dddb1202 FEDORA-EPEL-2022-19dddb1202 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3d01597e0b has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. |