Bug 1849752

Summary: [Doc RFE] Document Azure support for OCS 4.x (Technology Preview)
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage Reporter: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Component: documentationAssignee: Kusuma <kbg>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Martin Bukatovic <mbukatov>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.4CC: dcain, ebenahar, edonnell, etamir, fbalak, kbg, khartsoe, nbecker, nberry, ocs-bugs, rcyriac
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: OCS 4.4.1   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Technology Preview
Doc Text:
.Microsoft Azure Technology Preview support OpenShift Container Storage can now be installed and managed on Microsoft Azure. For more information see, the link:https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/4.5/html-single/deploying_and_managing_openshift_container_storage_on_microsoft_azure/index[Deploying and managing OpenShift Container Storage on Microsoft Azure] guide.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-04 16:24:07 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1859307    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Azure screenshot for "Figure 2.9. Details card in Persistent Storage Overview Dashboard"
none
Azure screenshot for "Figure 2.11. Details card in Object Service Overview Dashboard" none

Comment 7 Elad 2020-07-13 15:14:04 UTC
Hi Kusuma, since Blob is not being used as the default MCG backing store, due to bug 1825938, we need to include the creation of a default MCG backing store over Azure blob in the deployment procedure.

Comment 8 Elad 2020-07-14 08:08:01 UTC
In addition to comment #7, there are some things to fix in the docs:

- In the preview docs, there are some wrong references to AWS and AWS components, like in chapter `8.4.3. Available dynamic provisioning plug-ins` - 'AWS Elastic Block Store (EBS)' is mentioned.

- UPI is mentioned as a deployment type where different operations are possible, like scaling out (add node) and replacing a node - chapter `6.2.2. Adding a node on Azure user-provisioned infrastructure`. 
The problem is that OCS is supposed to be supported on Azure IPI only




There could be more, Martin and I will continue the review

Comment 13 Nimrod Becker 2020-07-21 06:27:52 UTC
@Elad,
Don't think we need to. Once the Azure BS was crated and set as the default, it will be used when not providing a specific BS when creating an OBC.

Comment 23 Elad 2020-07-31 16:04:25 UTC
Moving back to ASSIGNED following Filip's input

Comment 27 Martin Bukatovic 2020-08-03 21:49:06 UTC
Created attachment 1710240 [details]
Azure screenshot for "Figure 2.9. Details card in Persistent Storage Overview   Dashboard"

Comment 28 Martin Bukatovic 2020-08-03 21:49:57 UTC
Created attachment 1710241 [details]
Azure screenshot for "Figure 2.11. Details card in Object Service Overview   Dashboard"