Bug 1851267
Summary: | OpenStack: Set coredns forward policy to sequential | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Brendan Shirren <bshirren> |
Component: | Installer | Assignee: | Martin André <m.andre> |
Installer sub component: | OpenShift on OpenStack | QA Contact: | David Sanz <dsanzmor> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | eduen, kgarriso, m.andre, openshift-bugzilla-robot |
Version: | 4.4 | Keywords: | UpcomingSprint |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.4.z | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Cause: CoreDNS forward plugin uses a default policy of random to pick the upstream server.
Consequence: Clusters may not be able to resolve the OpenStack API hostname when the
user sets multiple external DNS resolvers such as ['172.31.8.1','8.8.8.8'], where 172.31.8.1 knows to resolve internal hostnames and 8.8.8.8 is a public resolver that doesn't know how to resolve internal hostnames.
Fix: Switch to the sequential policy to simulate the libc behavior.
Result: The DNS servers specified via externalDNS option are now used in order by CoreDNS.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-14 01:43:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1809611 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Brendan Shirren
2020-06-26 01:10:49 UTC
*** Bug 1851911 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Verified on 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-07-04-120349 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2871 |